Similarly, 34 CFR 106.21(a) carries on to prohibit recipients from discriminating on the basis of sex with regard to admissions, and the Department will continue on to keep recipients responsible for sexual intercourse discriminatory admissions guidelines and practices regardless of regardless of whether any specific or entity recruits applicants on the recipient's behalf. For occasion, commenters asked no matter whether a Title IX Coordinator's delegated personnel can examine studies to determine regardless of whether they are protected by Title IX, ascertain which studies have to have formal proceedings, coordinate responses to all reviews, or sign official problems on behalf of the Title IX Coordinator. If the Title IX Coordinator is found in an administrative business office or setting up that restricts, or impliedly restricts, access only to particular pupils ( e.g., a women's centre), this sort of a locale could violate § 106.8(a) by not "authorizing" a Title IX Coordinator to comply with all the responsibilities required of a Title IX Coordinator beneath these final laws (for case in point, a Title IX Coordinator have to intake experiences and formal issues of sexual harassment from any complainant regardless of the complainant's sex). Therefore, even if the Title IX Coordinator's workplace location is in an administrative setting up that is not quickly accessible to all students, any man or woman may speak to the Title IX Coordinator (in person, by mail, phone, or electronic mail) which include in approaches that allow for reporting for the duration of non-business enterprise several hours ( i.e., by mail, phone, or e mail).
